Saturday, November 21, 2009
| Login | Search | Contact Information |
RSNA 2008 Logo
loading


TOOLS
    Print
    Email Event
    Email Author
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Ne Siang Chew MBChB  
Abstract Co-Author
Dylan Tsukagoshi MBBS  
Benjamin Roberton MBChB, MRCP  
Jeremiah Healy MD  
Justin Lee MBBS  
SUBSPECIALTY CONTENT
Musculoskeletal Radiology
 
  CODE: SSM14-02
  SESSION: Musculoskeletal/Emergency (Skeletal Trauma)
 

Are Second Opinions on Appendicular Skeletal Trauma Accurate on Smartphones? Accuracy and Interobserver Variability Compared to Diagnostic Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS) Workstations

 
 
  DATE: Wednesday, December 03 2008
  START TIME: 03:10 PM
  END TIME: 03:20 PM
  LOCATION: S504ABC



  DISCLOSURES
  N.C. - Nothing to disclose.  
  D.T. - Nothing to disclose.  
  B.R. - Nothing to disclose.  
  J.H. - Nothing to disclose.  
  J.L. - Nothing to disclose.  

 PURPOSE
 

To evaluate the accuracy of appendicular trauma X-ray interpretation in next-generation Smartphones (including Apple iPhone) compared with gold-standard PACS workstations. 

To assess  interobserver variability between Smartphones and PACS workstation reading modalities.

  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 

Two radiology trainees and two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists prospectively evaluated 40 appendicular skeletal trauma radiographs. The set of radiographs were assessed on both the Apple iPhone sent as a file attachment (jpeg) and PACS workstations respectively by all four radiologists, two weeks apart.

Responses were recorded on proformas and assessed against a gold standard which was taken as a consultant opinion obtained on a diagnostic PACS workstation.

 

  
 RESULTS
 

Accuracy of radiology trainee reporting using the iPhone was 93%. On the PACS workstation, the accuracy of reporting was 95%.

The accuracy of consultant reporting of the trauma radiographs on the iPhone was 98%. On the PACS workstations which is taken as gold-standard, the accuracy was 100%.

The error in reporting by the consultant team on the iPhone may be attributed to viewing of a subtle abnormality on a reporting screen with a small field-of-view and lack to imaging manipulation function.

Intraobserver variability (Kappa value) between the iPhone and PACS workstations reading modalities on the was 0.8, indicating almost perfect agreement. 

 

 

  
 CONCLUSION
 

The accuracy of interpretation of appendicular trauma radiographs on the Apple iPhone is high at 93% to  98%.

However, for the radiology trainee, using a PACS workstation for interpretation of radiographs is more useful and reliable.

 

  
 CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION
 

Smartphones such as the Apple iPhone have a future role in providing a second opinions in appendicular trauma. However, improvements in software and harware technology are vital to facilitate this. 

  
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS EVENT EMAIL:
   drchew01@googlemail.com